低重心Subaru調高roll centre分享

我地個場係主要clockwise咁行, 右彎多過左彎, 咁正常係左邊d呔去得快d嫁啦
咁真正既race car(real car)如果有咁情況, 係咪會set到佢兩邊平均worn out呢?
但一架車既左右setting唔同, 會唔會影響佢其他方面呢(行直線, 彎心limit....)
咁究竟set到架車既左右磨蝕一樣重要, 定係提高彎中既limit重要呢, 兩者有無關系呢?
小弟突然想到這一大堆問題, 麻煩大家指教下丫
誠心討教

原帖由 ckwu 於 2008-2-14 07:54 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

I am not going to waist time with you, go out and find a book that talk about real car suspension setup like in option or cars and driver and you will know what I am talking about. My brother always ...

This is a mini-Z forum. I guess there should be many real car forums to post your reply.
You wrote," but the idea on suspension setting/weight distribution/weight transfer/tire choice is the same doesn't matter 1:1 or 1:100."
but I guess scale matters a lot because the proportional speed at corners of the mini-Z is even faster than that of an F1.

Thanks for reminding me to read. I have a habit of reading and I think I'll never stop it until I die. If you really had read enough, you wouldn't have typed "waist" for "waste", "talk about" for "talks about" ...and so on. Perhaps you are the one to read more.

[ 本帖最後由 billy86che 於 2008-2-14 15:41 編輯 ]

原帖由 billy86che 於 2008-2-14 15:30 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

This is a mini-Z forum. I guess there should be many real car forums to post your reply.
You wrote," but the idea on suspension setting/weight distribution/weight transfer/tire choice is the same ...

THANK YOU for bringing out my typo, I guess I had been in US too long that I don't care too much on spell check rather than try to read and understand what others are writing and put down what I know

原帖由 henry888 於 2008-2-14 10:01 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

我地個場係主要clockwise咁行, 右彎多過左彎, 咁正常係左邊d呔去得快d嫁啦
咁真正既race car(real car)如果有咁情況, 係咪會set到佢兩邊平均worn out呢?
但一架車既左右setting唔同, 會唔會影響佢其他方面呢(行直線 ...

It is not necessary to have left tire and right tire to worn evenly, but the inner tire wear and outter tire wear will not be that uneven.  In racing, they will put free weight closer to front, rear, left, or right to help weight transfer and different toe and camber on each wheel depend on what type of turn it have like clockwise, counter-clockwise, more left turn, more right turn, more sharp turn or wide corner.  But if left and right tire are worn the same way and front and rear is worn about the same percentage, then the car is quite balance for that track already.  There is no perfect setting for all condition, better turning, then less 行直線.

[ 本帖最後由 ckwu 於 2008-2-15 16:41 編輯 ]

原帖由 ckwu 於 2008-2-15 07:54 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

It is not necessary to have left tire and right tire to worn evenly, but will the to even the inner tire wear and outter tire wear.  In racing, they will put free weight closer to front, rear, lef ...

What a mess.
This is not "typo". I'd rather use the term "incomprehensible" (both for the Chinese and native English speakers). I'm happy to chat here but you still have to use a language that people understand.

[ 本帖最後由 billy86che 於 2008-2-15 13:28 編輯 ]

tt01上遙臂??

整9佰幾樣野咪又係車仔，又2.4 又caster , 咁不如玩十仔喇
玩車唔係咁玩 玩都上矖腦 最緊要改善下d姿勢同態度

[ 本帖最後由 腦屍反手呔 於 2008-2-15 16:42 編輯 ]

原帖由 腦屍反手呔 於 2008-2-15 16:34 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

整9佰幾樣野咪又係車仔，又2.4 又caster , 咁不如玩十仔喇
玩車唔係咁玩 玩都上矖腦 最緊要改善下d姿勢同態度

玩左1比10就唔洗改~~?????10仔未又係車...！！！！

原帖由 腦屍反手呔 於 2008-2-15 16:34 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

整9佰幾樣野咪又係車仔，又2.4 又caster , 咁不如玩十仔喇
玩車唔係咁玩 玩都上矖腦 最緊要改善下d姿勢同態度

agree, but we just have different way to enjoy a hobby and to express our passion.

原帖由 ckwu 於 2008-2-15 16:47 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

agree, but we just have different way to enjoy a hobby and to express our passion.

嗱.........呢d咪就係中肯加大方喇   
起碼唔會講兩句就黑面

我就真係未試過咁改，好唔好又或者得唔得~我唔清楚~！
不過~我覺得至少佢肯試~！興趣呢D野各有所好鐘意改咪改囉！！！

如果覺得出面PARTS唔乎合自己理想要求或嘗試改善，時間/金錢許可，那自己整都沒有問題吧~！
新科技，新產品都是經過改良及測試出來的~！
勇於嘗試是好事來的~！

原帖由 腦屍反手呔 於 2008-2-15 17:02 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

仲有呀 下次唔該用中文喇
你d英文真係好似你0的車咁 唔三唔四

唉.......it後面個verb ge s無哂,講到好似中文咁=]

原帖由 1999 於 2008-2-15 23:12 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

唉.......it後面個verb ge s無哂,講到好似中文咁=]

Which "it" do you mean? Did you mix up the two people talking here?

Sometimes we don't add 's' to the verb because it is an 'infinitive'. Such as we say,

"I wish to make it run faster."   instead of    "I wish to make it runs faster."

because after words like "make" "let" or "see", we should use a "bare infinitive" instead of another verb. You should have learnt all these in form 2 if you studied in Hong Kong.

[ 本帖最後由 billy86che 於 2008-2-16 00:38 編輯 ]

發老皮好似係另有其人喎, 仲有冇品的成份在內.
改車唔係一下子可以成功,有努力才會有進步,有實力就攞你的作品出來吧!

題外話   gc8  shell 好正~~

冇品在於你唔得光明正大用自己acc發言,而且不是串錯字,是打錯字居多喎,
anyway,我可能年紀太細乜都唔識,今年只得33歲,芵文又唔識,但我識咩叫"光明正大"囉.
你估你係"奇拿"咩,"你找不到我的"

原帖由 shouldbe 於 2008-2-16 01:51 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

冇品在於你唔得光明正大用自己acc發言,而且不是串錯字,是打錯字居多喎,
anyway,我可能年紀太細乜都唔識,今年只得33歲,芵文又唔識,但我識咩叫"光明正大"囉.
你估你係"奇拿"咩,"你找不到我的"

算數啦，其實玩吓無妨．

原帖由 billy86che 於 2008-2-16 01:47 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Another example.

係呀俾人攻擎得happy 唔 happy ? 你攻人就要預番比人攻嫁啦.

原帖由 腦屍反手呔 於 2008-2-16 01:57 發表

                               
登錄/註冊後可看大圖

係呀俾人攻擎得happy 唔 happy ? 你攻人就要預番比人攻嫁啦.

"俾人攻擊" is not the same as "俾人人身攻擊"．
I guess we are all wasting time here. Let's sleep.

[ 本帖最後由 billy86che 於 2008-2-16 02:04 編輯 ]

其實我都唔係支持邊個邊個,只是見呢位弟兄今天才註冊,覺得好奇才有感而發.
"奇拿"也未必係個壞人,佢也佢的立場,大家各有空間,出嚟玩車重於分享,不重於高低.