Interesting question, and I think I will try the subsequent steps depending on how slow is the response. Of course, the actual result will be subject to actual track testing:
1) Increase rear dampening
2) Increase rear and front dampening
3) Increase rear spring rate (all dampening go back to normal)
4) step 3 + step 1
5) step 3 + step 2
6) step 3 + Increase front spring rate
Assumption:
1) This zip-zap will constitute only part of the course, and I don't want to cut a forest down just for a tree by directly going to change spring rate.
2) The front spring rate is somewhat adequate, and allow the car to at least enter the first turn alright (so it is not too hard to even initial a turn)
3) The reason for choosing to use a higher rear spring rate before using a harder front spring--
To make the car able to quickly make consecutive turns, the chassis must not have too much front/rear weight transfer. And the harder rear will prevent too much weight transfer backward during the exit of a turn, which also allow more front traction to initial the next turn.
[ 本帖最後由 Aurora 於 2008-4-8 14:54 編輯 ] |
收藏
勁正
嬲嬲
樓主
