RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區

標題: LB/WW2/Midnight pumpkin which one is better? [打印本頁]

作者: agentjerry    時間: 2007-5-29 22:53
標題: LB/WW2/Midnight pumpkin which one is better?
which one is better?
Is their cover can be exchanged to use?


作者: dl7    時間: 2007-5-29 23:17
MP!

作者: agentjerry    時間: 2007-5-29 23:24
原帖由 dl7 於 2007-5-29 23:17 發表
MP!


why?

do u have one?

any hop up e.g motor?
作者: dl7    時間: 2007-5-29 23:26
http://bbs.rc-evo.com/viewthread.php?tid=44971
作者: dl7    時間: 2007-5-29 23:26
http://bbs.rc-evo.com/viewthread.php?tid=44456
作者: dl7    時間: 2007-5-29 23:27
http://bbs.rc-evo.com/viewthread.php?tid=43968
作者: smallfaifai    時間: 2007-5-30 09:37
<>
原帖由 <I>agentjerry</I> 於 2007-5-29 22:53 發表 which one is better? Is their cover can be exchanged to use? <IMG alt= src="./images/smilies/sweat.gif" border=0 smilieid="10">
</P>
<>&nbsp;</P>
<>LB同MP用同一個車架,但殼柱有所唔同……</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>WW2直頭連車架、用o既車軨都唔同,同埋WW2前後軸距短好多……</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>睇呢個post您大概比較到MP同WW2的分別……</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P><A href="http://bbs.rc-evo.com/viewthread.php?tid=45166&amp;extra=page%3D1">http://bbs.rc-evo.com/viewthread.php?tid=45166&amp;extra=page%3D1</A></P>
作者: mikewu    時間: 2007-5-30 09:38
Lunchbox is better as the body poles are not as easy to break in compare with the MP.....
作者: agentjerry    時間: 2007-5-30 18:22
原帖由 mikewu 於 2007-5-30 09:38 發表
Lunchbox is better as the body poles are not as easy to break in compare with the MP.....


so how abt WW2?

if you buy, which one you would choose?

tks


作者: mikewu    時間: 2007-5-30 18:24
原帖由 agentjerry 於 2007-5-30 18:22 發表


so how abt WW2?

if you buy, which one you would choose?

tks



I have all three.. but I think the Lunchbox is more fun... that's just my person taste though....
作者: gibson    時間: 2007-5-30 18:33
I also have those three, if only can buy one, I will buy WW2, the chassis is much much durable, the big head (the driver) is super cute!!!!!
作者: bigben    時間: 2007-5-30 19:09
for cutie,  I would grade as follow : 1) WW 2) pumpkin 3) LB
作者: TOMY(HONG)    時間: 2007-5-30 19:17
i like WW2
作者: mikewu    時間: 2007-5-30 19:19
For "cump", i think the LB is the best..
作者: agentjerry    時間: 2007-5-30 19:30
My god!!!

so i won't buy E savage and use the money to buy these Three cutie,cump and lovely RC


作者: TOMY(HONG)    時間: 2007-5-30 19:31
原帖由 mikewu 於 2007-5-30 19:19 發表
For "cump", i think the LB is the best..

自然cup 4
作者: agentjerry    時間: 2007-5-30 19:41
原帖由 TOMY(HONG) 於 2007-5-30 19:31 發表

自然cup 4


what is the meaning?


作者: agentjerry    時間: 2007-5-31 21:34
go go go
WW2..................


作者: dl7    時間: 2007-5-31 22:16
Seems every cars have fans.....

作者: smallfaifai    時間: 2007-6-1 14:34
我有LB同WW2,似乎WW2係會耐用D,佢個結構比較似一般touring……LB的懸掛真係麻麻地,比較易爛。

但我個人覺得LB得意D既。
作者: dl7    時間: 2007-6-1 15:48
How about the 懸掛 of MP?

作者: agentjerry    時間: 2007-6-1 19:17
標題: help WW2!!!
i brought the WW2 and played it with a lot of fun

but when i insert the battery into the car. i wonder if the battery is too long and the
battery holder can't be used to prevent the battery coming out.

anyone had the same experience. pls help
作者: agentjerry    時間: 2007-6-1 19:49
標題: WW2 help
Bros.

i brought the WW2 and played it with a lot of fun but when i insert the battery into the car. i wonder if the battery is too long and the battery holder can't be used to prevent the battery coming out. anyone had the same experience. pls help
what can i do????


作者: bigben    時間: 2007-6-2 00:54
which brand of battery are you using ? GP?
作者: agentjerry    時間: 2007-6-2 10:27
原帖由 bigben 於 2007-6-2 00:54 發表
which brand of battery are you using ? GP?



intellect 7.2V 4200mah
作者: smallfaifai    時間: 2007-6-4 01:48
原帖由 dl7 於 2007-6-1 15:48 發表
How about the 懸掛 of MP?


MP同LB係一樣o既……如果原裝落場都有機會斷……個人覺得可以玩爛先換o既。




歡迎光臨 RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區 (https://www.rc-evo.com/xbbs/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2