RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區

標題: AWD SAS rear suspension [打印本頁]

作者: scalpel 時間: 2007-3-21 20:10
標題: AWD SAS rear suspension
Any brothers using it? How's it performance compare to the original one? Welcome to discuss!

作者: tonytjia@zone 時間: 2007-3-22 10:36
標題: 回復 #1 scalpel 的帖子
I saw someone is using it and the feedback is good but difficult to set.
The lastest information is to use all 0 degree maybe 1 degree chamber.

作者: scalpel 時間: 2007-3-22 12:46

原帖由 tonytjia@zone 於 2007-3-22 10:36 發表
I saw someone is using it and the feedback is good but difficult to set.
The lastest information is to use all 0 degree maybe 1 degree chamber.

But I heard someone said the rear Diff. must be Atomic one, is it true?

Thanks!

作者: luiho2002 時間: 2007-3-22 21:21

原帖由 scalpel 於 2007-3-22 12:46 發表

But I heard someone said the rear Diff. must be Atomic one, is it true? Thanks!

可以用京商珠差,但用唔到牙差

作者: scalpel 時間: 2007-3-22 21:43

原帖由 luiho2002 於 2007-3-22 21:21 發表

可以用京商珠差,但用唔到牙差

I see! Thanks a lot!

作者: rock.t. 時間: 2007-3-23 16:20
SAS system is good for high speed seeting.
In my opinion, toe in and camber settings are 2 and you may make some down stop.
My motor is T2 (42000RPM) now. If it seted with original one, it would roll while turning very often.

作者: scalpel 時間: 2007-3-23 20:28

原帖由 rock.t. 於 2007-3-23 16:20 發表
SAS system is good for high speed seeting.
In my opinion, toe in and camber settings are 2 and you may make some down stop.
My motor is T2 (42000RPM) now. If it seted with original one, it would ...

Thanks for your valuable information!

作者: tonytjia@zone 時間: 2007-3-30 14:40
標題: 回復 #6 rock.t. 的帖子
If I use AD PCB no Fet with AD stock motor so my toe in and camber degree can be less, correct?

For example:
Front 1 degree camber, Rear 2 Degree camber
Front 0 or -1 degree toe in, Rear 0 or 1 degree toe in

作者: rock.t. 時間: 2007-3-31 17:17
標題: 回復 #8 tonytjia@zone 的帖子
Yes! you are right.
That is a good setting for your car.

Having a good drive.

歡迎光臨 RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區 (https://www.rc-evo.com/xbbs/)