標題: 你對Walkera整體產品看法? [打印本頁] 作者: tanksamho 時間: 2011-2-27 02:08 標題: 你對Walkera整體產品看法? 你對Walkera 整體產品看法包括造工,用料品質,設計(電子&硬件)等...或可留言你對Walkera看法?作者: nel3838 時間: 2011-2-28 08:07
Good effort on new designs, especially with 3.7V electronics which make lightweight aircraft possible which is great. RC Tx and Rx also very good. The main thing is need to provide clearer instructions on the various Tx/Rx functions. Notice that there had been many upgrades on Tx/Rx versions and some are backward compatible, which is good, but the instructions are not very clear as to what is compatible to what. And which features/functions than become enabled or disabled.
Overall, good R&D, and needs to improve much on documentation and communication. Perhaps Walkera can start to consider other high end RC models, such as serious RC race cars.作者: khho01 時間: 2011-2-28 13:45
出新機太快 D 舊機零件,又吾可以共用又貴,好快就沒 parts ...
壞處是 bad contact 接觸不良 (電池 & motor)
行尾無刷moter 重快死(CB100,4#3B ), 因為 沒bearing 要成日換,
好處是可以 full set 或 half set 買, 返來叉電就飛得.作者: highbeing 時間: 2011-3-3 14:02
一個字"貴"作者: pakpakpakhk 時間: 2011-3-12 10:52
CB100 is good!作者: goflygo 時間: 2011-4-16 23:37
I like them mostly on their product design and performance of such smaller size heli. The CB100 tail motor is fine provided you can make a good soldering job after crash but still much better than those brushed motor.e.g the MSR 's tail motor. 作者: fun_heli 時間: 2011-4-17 00:56
貴貴貴貴作者: g4tommy2000 時間: 2011-4-18 14:29
好玩，價錢唔系問題作者: Kis`s 時間: 2011-4-22 15:20
好少地方有parts買, 貴
一炒機好易爛 (cb100) 對比solo pro同 trex100作者: kenlau 時間: 2011-4-26 13:54
設計幾好，不過真的很貴！作者: khho01 時間: 2011-4-26 14:09
唉 ! 加晒價 ... 20% 至 30% 很貴！作者: khho01 時間: 2011-4-26 14:10
唉 ! 加晒價 ... 20% 至 30% 很貴！作者: DWKN 時間: 2011-4-28 16:21
Once I thought they were pioneers in making micro-sized RC helis especially those flybarless versions. I bought 2 of these (a 120VD01 and a 120VD02) and my comment is they are fragile (both plastic and metal parts) and the 3-axis gyro is not performing good.
Once I got the mCPX, I can say it flys a lot much better even without any metal parts. For a flybarless micro heli, the 3-axis gyro is more predictable / controllable and the performance can be comparable to larger helis using flybar system. 作者: mastersteno 時間: 2011-4-28 18:45 回復 DWKN 的帖子
So those flybarless models (e.g v120 series) are not so good when comparing with mCPX? I am interested in V120D6, cos its the cheapest 6ch flybarless model,,,if V120d1/2 are just fair,,I may not go for V120d6!作者: DWKN 時間: 2011-4-29 16:57 回復 mastersteno 的帖子
I am not so sure whether both V120D6 and my V120D2 are using the same gyro control software. But for flying performance (I'm not flying 3D), the mCPX is much better.
BTW, V120D6 is not using brushless main motor. Performance might drop after some flights.作者: highbeing 時間: 2011-5-9 17:00
其實我覺得佢做到依個檔次, 唔應該再出有刷motor. 用有刷係一個trick.作者: asaq-wong 時間: 2011-5-21 01:23
a bit 貴 law~~作者: TLMO 時間: 2014-2-10 16:03
用唔過，品質劣質作者: tc3driver 時間: 2014-2-10 18:44 本帖最後由 tc3driver 於 2014-2-10 18:48 編輯
