AWD SAS rear suspension

Any brothers using it? How's it performance compare to the original one? Welcome to discuss!

I saw someone is using it and the feedback is good but difficult to set.
The lastest information is to use all 0 degree maybe 1 degree chamber.

原帖由 tonytjia@zone 於 2007-3-22 10:36 發表
I saw someone is using it and the feedback is good but difficult to set.
The lastest information is to use all 0 degree maybe 1 degree chamber.

But I heard someone said the rear Diff. must be Atomic one, is it true? Thanks!

原帖由 scalpel 於 2007-3-22 12:46 發表


But I heard someone said the rear Diff. must be Atomic one, is it true? Thanks!

可以用京商珠差,但用唔到牙差

原帖由 luiho2002 於 2007-3-22 21:21 發表

可以用京商珠差,但用唔到牙差

I see! Thanks a lot!

SAS system is good for high speed seeting.
In my opinion, toe in and camber settings are 2 and you may make some down stop.
My motor is T2 (42000RPM) now. If it seted with original one, it would roll while turning very often.

原帖由 rock.t. 於 2007-3-23 16:20 發表
SAS system is good for high speed seeting.
In my opinion, toe in and camber settings are 2 and you may make some down stop.
My motor is T2 (42000RPM) now. If it seted with original one, it would  ...

Thanks for your valuable information!

If I use AD PCB no Fet with AD stock motor so my toe in and camber degree can be less, correct?

For example:
Front 1 degree camber, Rear 2 Degree camber
Front 0 or -1 degree toe in, Rear 0 or 1 degree toe in

Yes! you are right.
That is a good setting for your car.
Having a good drive.